>Hi Steve,
>
>First, I know that I wouldn't rate something as "Disagree..." if *I* thought it was not feasible. I'd write a comment to the wisher and I'd withold my rating pending a reply.
>

I agree with you here (within reason *grin*)

>Now, as to the question of feasibility...
>

The server receiving the data, and acknowledging that it has successfully stored the data, is one thing. As far as a workstation is concerned, data storage has occured at this point in time. Whether or not it has physically hit the disk is another issue altogether...it is the responsibility of the server; it is beyond our control. It is beyond VFP's control.

I'm sorry, not only do I not see how this is feasible, I'm not convinced it is desirable.

Cheers to you,