>>My interpretation of the documentation is that all fields that are not calculated must be included in the group by clause. So if the old SQL statement were:

Are we moving backward here? I mean what would be the purpose of removing the previous supported syntax, which was great, and forcing us now to add all fields in the GROUP BY clause just so it'd work? My statements are directed in general and not specific to you. :) I'm just questioning myself as to know why is that purpose.