Hi!
>Reading your Wish #1146 again, I'm satisfied with the way you've expressed it.
>
I'm too. Just no mentioning of "Server" seems better, because client machine usually cannot control ANY caching on server by any way.
I also would like to re-phrase the wish in following way (Jim, if you want, include this into wish):
FLSUH should work better to flush internal OS buffers even in case write-behind caching is switched on. This way I would not require to go to each client computer and confugure it to switch off write-behind caching.
Vlad Grynchyshyn, Project Manager, MCP
vgryn@yahoo.comICQ #10709245
The professional level of programmer could be determined by level of stupidity of his/her bugs
It is not appropriate to say that question is "foolish". There could be only foolish answers. Everybody passed period of time when knows nothing about something.
