>Gee Garrett, I've got two Seti's running and I don't see this flaky behavior. While I
>do have a dual processor 2gHz Xeon system, I'm not sure why Seti would "eat" more VFP's
>cycles than say Word.

My guess is that one of them isn't being friendly enough about playing with others -- I refuse to speculate on which it is. :-)

However, S@H _definitely_ uses more CPU time than Word -- most of the time, Word is just sitting blinking its cursor.