Hi Denis,

I disagree. I've run into many VB and C developers that have bad-talked VFP from their knowledge of VFP3. After enlightening them on the advantages of VFP a demo would have been great. A demo, IMHO, also does a LOT of marketing on its own as many developers would download and try it out from curiousity alone and some would stay with it once they saw its capabilities. From there, the more VFP8 users, the more money and manhours MSFT will invest in product updates and marketing.

Tracy

>You forgot to tell that putting energies on a demo version would take time away from the all the marketing efforts <g>. And we really don't want that to happen.
>
>>While it may seem easy to you, in reality, it isn't that simple:
>>
>>- How would you cripple the demo? Limit the number of records? Disable some functionality? Time bomb it?
>>- Developers currently working on Europa would need to divert time and attention to the demo.
>>- Testers would need to fully test the demo, again taking away from Europa.
>>- Some users would prefer the resources be placed on a demo version, others would rather see them fixing actual bugs in VFP8 so they don't appear in Europa.
>>
>>>Does anybody knows why there is no evaluation version of VFP8 ?
>>>I need to test VFP8 without paying. I do not want to work with BETA .
>>>Why something that is quite common in software industry (see VS.NET see DELPHI etc etc etc) can't be done in case of VFP. It seem SO EASY. I do not understand. I do not understand. Such things make me feel more and more like stupid staying with VFP ?