I'm in the camp that thinks there should be a demo version. Look how the public beta demonstrated excitement for the product. I've been pointing out some of the arguements that have been used in the past against a demo version.


>
>Sorry but you do not understand. I have money to buy VFP.
>
>>I don't see how an eval version can help improve the product. It could possibly improve the sales, but maybe not the product itself. I help improve the product by being a beta tester.
>
>A software product is not only a group of files on a disk it is also composed of additional services provided by vendor (like web site, samples etc.) Making a product and building walls between customer and the product is not something that I can easy understand. It is also wasting of the time you spend on beta testing.