>SNIP
>>
>>If the UN can not live up to enforcing its resolutions, then the US and any other country who wishes to support the US have the absolute right and obligation to enforce them without UN approval. I lay that blame at the feet of the UN.
>
>So does that mean, after the 1441 and the next related one and the 16 previous ones related are "enforced", that the U.N. should now start to enforce all those prior resolutions that remain unenforced? That would seem the honourable approach to me.
I only see 2 options -- either repeal the unenforced resolution or enforce it. Otherwise, the UN is worthless. IMO, the UN is not far form worthless as it is now.
Mark McCasland
Midlothian, TX USA