>>Below 25%, yet he was still in power? Amazing, huh?
>
>Is this too difficult to understand ? Maybe it is, the US only really has 2 political parties, so power is likely to go to the one with over 50% support (except, I understand with the current president).

No, but it totaly contradicts the poster's message that he would lose the election, when he turns right around and says that he was a master of stealing elections. And that was my point: with 25% and still in power, a master at stealing elections, he was not going to be removed anytime soon.

>In a true multi-party democracy, where each party represents a part of the country, then it is very likely that the winning party will get a relatively low proportion of the votes & still end up leading the country.

That wasn't the point he was making. His point was that he was going to soon be out of power if NATO had not stepped in. With him being a master at stealing elections (as the original poster pointed out, not me), I don't think the women of Kosovo cared to wait.