Let us know what, if anything, you hear back from MS.

Alan

>The bottom line for me is that if that paragraph still reads the same way when VFP8 becomes available in March, I for one, will not be able to justify upgrading.
>>
>>I know that Ken said otherwise in an earlier note, but as he never did respond to Sergey, and since I do believe that the EULA will take precedence over anything said off the cuff in a newsgroup, I just don't see how I can take the chance. Not that I think MS will necessarily jump all over those who continue to use version 7 (the basis for upgrade), but for a professional developer, a license agreement is not something to take lightly.
>>
>>Alan
>
>
>Hi Alan,
>
>I agree. It's not like companies/developers are going to be able to upgrade all of their applications overnight either. I'll e-mail MS and see what they have to say, but I would imagine that the first response will be, "Whatever the EULA says, is all I can tell you."
>
>At this point all I can recommend to clients is that, depending on how many licenses they want to/can upgrade, they keep an older license for a designated build machine and compile there while they upgrade applications in stages.
>
>
>- Brian