I don't know for VS .Net. but I would'nt be surprised it it was the case.

Perhaps someone will clarify this.


>Are you serious? If so, this means VFP8 is not Visual Foxpro, it's another product.
>
>
>>I doubt it because Visual studio .Net is not Visual Studio it's another product.
>>
>>>Brian
>>>If i follow right Denis's logic, when putting this statement in VFP8 means MS just found the legal way to kill the Fox, so i guess putting it in .NET should be there to legally kill Visual Studio 6.0 ?
>>>Jaime
>>>
>>>>
>>>>I think that coming to that conclusion is a stretch. Why? Because I just looked at the EULA for .NET and guess what, it says the same thing:
>>>>
>>>>7. UPGRADES. To use a Product identified as an upgrade, you must first be licensed for the product identified by Microsoft as eligible for the upgrade. After upgrading, you may no longer use the product that formed the basis for your upgrade eligibility.You may use the resulting upgraded product only in accordance with the terms of this EULA. If the Product is an upgrade of a component of a package of software programs that you licensed as a single product, the Product may be used and transferred only as part of that single product package and may not be separated for use by more than one end user.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>So, it looks to me like MS is trying to standardize their EULA...
>>>>
>>>>- Brian