But then it is obvious that VFP developers actually
read the EULA and abide by it while most VB developers do not (I think), so they will continue happily on working in both version quite ignorantly. Remember the phrase 'Ignorance is Bliss?' Of course that does not make what they are doing legal, but until MSFT catches them...
Tracy
>>Standardisation is ok but VFP has many versions where .Net is just beginning to roll. So I'd say that it's hard to do comparisons.
>>
>
>
>
>Yes, but look at it this way, because of that clause in .NET, anyone who used VS 6 or VB 6 to get the upgrade pricing for VS.NET will have just as much of a problem. Maybe more since VB.Net is not backward compatiable with VB 6.
>
>
>- Brian
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
