Thomas
I'd have to agree with Fred. What purpose in attacking the French or casting back in history for stuff they did wrong. Most nations did stuff wrong at one time or another. If people want to nurse resentments then the Suez-Sinai episode, Armenians in Turkey, Bay of Pigs, Rainbow Warrior, Bikini Atoll might be added in there as well.
Take a look at
http://www.megastories.com/mideast/wars/1956.htm. How *dare* the French not support the US, right? Also check
http://www.megastories.com/mideast/wars/1956.htm for a reasonably fair summary of the reasons why US got involved in aid/military in the Middle East in the first place. Also consider the US's firm position at that time, as stated in the UN, that force is inappropriate to settle international matters. How things change.
Seriously, I am not getting at the US, I'm pointing out that everybody can cast back for resentments but if it starts affecting relationships in 2003, those responsible might as well go and help Saddam on his quest for world peace.
FWIW, France occupied by Germany is a bit like the South immediately after your Civil War; there is smouldering resentment but most people are aware of consequences of overt opposition. The French have always been pragmatists.
Regards
JR
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1