Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
The French and Unilateralism
Message
From
07/03/2003 21:33:56
 
 
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00754584
Message ID:
00763165
Views:
15
SNIP
>
>You say that you would still have the same belief that we should wait until untold number (posibibly millions) die before we "react"? All I remember is the rage I felt about NYC being attacked on 9/11. SH cannot be allowed to stand if he's capable of supporting or supplying terrorists with the means to cause so much havok!

No, I wouldn't ALWAYS wait for untold numbers to die, but I certainly would wait for more than what we KNOW now regarding the Iraq situation before WARRING on them.
I think it's fair to say that the VAST majority of the world was shocked and horrified by what happened on 9/11! I think that the widespread cooperation on terrorist detection/arrest - even by the French, Germans, Russians, etc - proves this admirably.
But France or the U.K. or Russia or Israel or Pakistan or India or China or North Korea or a few more have the A-bomb, so they could possibly be similarly disposed as Saddam is assumed to be. And any country has, or can easily have, chemical or biological weapons, and so they could pose a threat too. The world CANNOT be "civilized" if one country can not only accuse another but also WAR on it on the basis of a possible and definitely not visible threat. It essentially means the end of humanity!

>Even if he had nothing to do with 9/11, he could be the catalyst to something far worse.

OK, so then who's next and who decides??? So far it looks like President Bush decides. What if Angola feared military action from the U.S.?... could they have the U.N. send in inspectors?

>I truly do believe it would be best to have an Iraqi "insider" take him out, but we've been waiting for that for over 12 years.

On that we certainly agree. HE is one nasty piece of work. That his people have to be killed and that those people's country has to be levelled when he is essentially powerless at this time is what is hard to swallow.
And by the way, there were at least two (and I think more) well-organized efforts to overthrow Saddam not long after Gulf War I and the poor people involved were left to go it alone at the last minute by the U.S. THAT is a primary reason why there is less trust than there could be for the U.S. by your average Iraqi, I'm told.
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform