>By what I've seen in all these threads about Iraq/Sadam, I've concluded (hope that errouneosly) that US government and the american people are scared to death by terrorism and think they must eliminate this aledged threat by any means attacking whatever country they find, even remotelly, connected to terrorism, in a way that closely resembles a "crusade against the evil" and as such, commanded by God Himself.

While we are not scared to death of terrorism, it does indeed scare us. We will do what is necessary to prevent another attack like September 11th. We would prefer that Iraq comply with 1441. They haven't. We would prefer that Saddam go into exile. He won't.

>Sorry, to say, but the way US behaves is based a psychotic disorder characterized by delusions of persecution with or without grandeur, often strenuously defended with apparent logic and reason, and extreme, irrational distrust of others, in short: paranoia.

You and many in this country would have said the same thing on September 10th, 1991. Very few in this country saw Al Qaeda as an immediate threat, including myself. If the United States had gone to the United Nations before September 11th, 2001 and said that we need to attack Afghanistan, the world would have said it's not necessary. We will not wait for another attack.

>Think there is no other country in the world that behaves the same way US regarding this subject, in such a belicist fashion, not believing in diplomacy. No other country in the world interferes as the US in other countries' internal affairs, often aledging the "crusade against the evil".

We do believe in diplomacy. However, diplomacy did not work in Kosovo in 1998. Were you aware that it wasn't the United Nations that stopped the ethnic cleansing in Kosovo? As a matter of fact, the U.N. Security Council didn't even vote on it. It was NATO.

And as far as diplomacy, have you been misled by your media about who is with us? MOST of Europe. Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, maybe Turkey. Either you are being misled, or aren't paying attention. No offense.

>Here in Brazil people say that the US (government) considers itself as "the police of the world", and so (US thinks they are) authorized to interfere whenever they want in any country using its economic or military power.

You mean like Gulf War 1991 or Kosovo in 1998? Or the 30 Billion dollar loan Brazil received from the International Monetary Fund (backed by the US)?

>This behavior of the US probably (certainly) will have a terrible end, and we all must pray that the great american people realize they must sufocate this delirant maquinations of some insame people that are ruining the relationship of the US and the rest of the world.

You couldn't be more wrong. As the White House Press Secretary said the other day, when Iraq is liberated, the people there will remember who came to their aid.

>There is no offense in what I'm saying here, and I'm being very sincere.