>For classes that must be done in .prgs I still think you'd want to work with a smaller atomic unit of one class definition per prg file. You don't want to go back to 2.x style of using monolithic procedure files.
>
David;
That made me laugh "monolithic procedure files". Great term. Just like writing code for VB. Somehow I have never liked that style.
Tom
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only