>>"Complicity in coup against Chilean government plus the "killing, injury and displacement" of three million people during Vietnam War."
>>http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20030311.wnnagee3/BNStory/National/
>
>Thanks.
>
>Interesting article. "Until now, those brought to trial largely have come from poor or defeated countries such as Serbia and Rwanda. But activists say that must change. To have any force, international law must apply to the rich and powerful too."

Hmmm. Does that mean that we should go about claiming more incidents as 'criminal'?
And in such a case how is that to be done... a witchhunt?
I look at the "friendly fire" incident that killed 4 Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan. Is that the calibre of a world court action?
The bunker bombed in Gulf War I no doubt had civilians in it, but apparently it also had military command facilities/personnel in lower levels. Is its bombing a world court affair?
The Chinese Embassy in Belgrade was erroneously bombed due to outdated maps. Is that a world court actionable event?

Going around indicting people/organizations from powerful countries just to make a point loses the whole meaning of "justice", at least as I see it.