Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Saddam's Support of Terrorism
Message
Information générale
Forum:
Politics
Catégorie:
International
Divers
Thread ID:
00765411
Message ID:
00765910
Vues:
35
>>Just reporting figures I heard yesterday, I said the drift is towards war, so I wont argue - different polls come up with figures anyway. The point stil remains, accepting your figures, are the 41% opposed to war anti-american ?
>
>No, their opposition to this war does not make them anti-American. What I wrote was that your posts in this forum are definitely anti-American. Specifically, insinuating that there was no difference between the US military training teenagers to kill and terrorist organizations training teenagers to kill. Tracy Holzer blasted you for that one before I had a chance.

Chris;

We must remember the honor and dignity that go along with representing and potentially giving your life for your country as a member of the military establishment. Such an act is condoned by “society”, and is considered “civil” and within certain norms that have been embraced for thousands of years. Killing others while observing military protocol and the Geneva Convention are imperative to maintaining the dignity of the military establishment in our country and others. If a society does not have an organized military they have reverted to things like guerrilla warfare or terrorism.

The end result of military action, guerrilla warfare or terrorism is the same – someone is going to die or be threatened. In any case each of these acts is a political statement or an extension of a political viewpoint. Why do we condone military action regardless of the acts committed in almost every case? If you are the military of the loosing side you may have serious problems with the winners.

Around 1936 Mao se Tung wrote a book and included some words on guerrilla warfare. He stated, “as long as there is one guerrilla there is war”! What is the difference between guerrilla warfare and terrorism? The words perhaps but the acts are the same. How does an “official” military organization of a nation differ from guerrilla warfare and terrorism? It is accepted by the individual nation but may be despised by other nations.

Speaking of guerrilla warfare, the early Americans used such tactics to defeat the British and Hessians (German soldiers) by using the fighting tactics of the American Indians. We did not fight by the book. Such a degrading way to fight! In fact we were traitors and rebels fighting against the authority of the land. Why our men hid behind a tree or bush, and actually shot officers – which was an unheard of act!

At one time guerrilla warfare and terrorism were internal affairs of a nation. Today terrorism is also considered an international event and any reason may be excuse for its existence. As for the military of any nation, such organizations have always been used for internal or external control.

Whatever happens in history as well as currently is controlled by rationalizations. When you apply facts and logic the rationalizations may be taken apart one by one. What counts in the end was what action was take.

Tom
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform