Dear Chris;

In spite of the title of this thread (which with all due respect makes me laugh) I'm going to point the following:

Anti-war site? Give me a break....and please, delve a little before say anything. I guess you are capable to do at least that, aren't you? If not, then it means you aren't interested in such readings. In this case you better say nothing to prevent an unfortunate misunderstanding.

BTW... I didn't realize (until now) that you're basing your perspective in "news sites". Keep eating the "truly" biased (using your favorite adjective) news and keep feeding regular minded people. Remember, sometimes news<>truth. (It depends who and/or what manages the news, I'm sure you already knew that)
Logic, reasoning, facts and consequences might help.

Finally, please be advised: The contents above are just a part of an opinion so don't ask about news references or related since I do like reality rather than sweet oil dreams.

Cheers and enjoy your freedom....






>>>No, it won't be Saddam that opens the envelope. But it wasn't Bin Laden that flew those planes into the World Trade Center, was it?
>>
>>We can't be sure of anything that has Mr Bush involved... did you check the content of the web site pointed out in message #766498?
>
>That isn't a news site. It's an anti-war site. If you prefer to get your "information" from a source that is so completely biased, it certainly explains a lot of your posts in this forum.