>>After reading almost all messages in all threads (ufffff!!!) about Iraq, Israel, Bush, terrorism... I reminded the end of WWII:
>>
>>"At the end of World War II, one of America's top military leaders accurately assessed the shift in the balance of world power which that war had produced and foresaw the enormous danger of communist aggression against the West. Alone among U.S. leaders he warned that America should act immediately, while her supremacy was unchallengeable, to end that danger."
>>
>>http://www.jeffsarchive.com/Jews%20and%20Communism/General%20Patton's%20Warning.html
>>
>>The question is: Just after Iraq, what "dangerous" country will be the next one? Please, don't tell me that Iraq will be "enough" for Bush's purposes (whatever they are)!
>
>
>Lybia will be the next, according to US ambassador

Two weeks ago the Administration announced why the UN Inspectors could not find the WMD. The WMD have been transferred to Libya and several other nations. Why do we not attack the nations where the WMD are located?

I think our Administration has more that a credibility problem. Consistency, respect of others, and logical decisions based upon priorities seem to be missing. I think the doors of the insane asylum have been opened and the occupants are now running our nation.