Hi Hector,

I have read to that article much time ago. Tanks!

I have report this for your information and your comment.

BEGIN TRANSACTION
is un work around.

If I do not have local data changed, why i have to do BEGIN TRANSACTION
( it is a semaphore for not exit !).

Moreover, BEGIN TRANSACTION is scoped to datasession, not nominative
(type BEGIN TRANSACTION transName ),
then background update, two or more suspend update are impossible on one datasession.

For me this is a big bug.

( IF @@TRANCOUNT>0 ROLLBACK is correct )

Fabio