>That too is a fallable argument. Because, even if pro-war people use fallable arguments, that doesn't give you the 'right' to use fallable arguments also. It only gives you the right to try to prove the fallability of those pro-war arguments.
>

hm... i think that is what i did. You're right is to find my arguments are "fallable".

>>
>>>... asking them not to demonstrate anti-war.
>>
>>If everyboby could do that... in both direction. Too late Peter <s>
>
>The point is that all those anti-war demonstrations are bad for the morale of the Americans and British soldiers, and are 'good' for the morale of the Iraqi soldiers. This will have a negative impact on the development of the war: more people will gonna die on both sides. Mark my words!

hm... great words. And what about democratie, individual pov, right to chat freely?
this weekend, Bush administration attempts to make TV say nothing about american prisoners, is, imo, another demonstration of good democraty. And what about iraki prisoners? ach, the question wasn't important at this moment, you're right.

Who knows if iraqi soldiers are surveying UT... <s>

morale of soldier isn't my main problem, whatever/whereever soldier we are talking about.

Ok, shut up Fred!