>Any way to use an mtdll instead of an exe?? You could call a .EXE COM Server from a VFP mtdll server.
I was mulling over just that scenario. Do all of the CPU intensive work in a COM mtdll then actually create the PDF in a COM exe (which is less CPU intensive). So far so testing has revealed that that the DLL also tries to take 100% of the CPU time.
>Also, you could use the Sleep(0) API to stop it from going to 100%
I'll try this right now.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only