S'more Perle-spin: http://www.ariannaonline.com/columns/files/032603.html

>WOW! - he was (is) UNPAID!!!
>
>I guess that's how his (and Rumsfeld's) ethics could allow this to continue. Similar to "plausible deniability".
>
>I wonder if we can trust that Perle's influence will end with his "resignation"? I have my doubts.
>
>Perle's influence is not only with defense/war policy. Last night I saw a taped interview (6 weeks old I think) where he commented that the U.N. is best DISbanded or at the very least recreated. His idea is to have an organization that "shares the same values as the U.S.".
>Clearly he can have only one purpose for such an arrangement - to enforce U.S. values on the countries that are not members of that cozy club.
>
>He and the other members of the cabal are dangerous to the health of the world for sure, but also to that of the U.S.
>
>By the way, thanks for the quote.
>
>>Here is what the New York times had to say:
>>
>>
>>March 24, the New York Times published this staff editorial elaborating on Mr. Perle's gross conflict of interest:
>>
>>Richard Perle's Conflict
>>As chairman of the Defense Policy Board, Richard Perle has been an influential architect of the Bush administration's Iraq policy and war plans. At the same time, it turns out, he has signed on to represent a major telecommunications company that has a strong financial interest in lobbying the Defense Department. This is a conflict pure and simple, and Mr. Perle should immediately drop one of his two roles.
>>
>>Mr. Perle, who served as an assistant defense secretary under President Reagan, is indisputably an important part of the current Defense Department. His position as chairman of the policy board, to which he was appointed by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, is unpaid. But he is nevertheless considered a "special government employee" and is subject to federal ethics rules.
>>
>>Global Crossing, the telecommunications giant, is now in bankruptcy. It has retained Mr. Perle to help persuade the Defense Department to drop its objections to a proposed sale to foreign buyers in Hong Kong and Singapore. The deal has been opposed by the Defense Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation as a threat to national security because it would put Global Crossing's fiber optics network, which is used by the United States government, under foreign control. Mr. Perle stands to make up to $725,000 from his work for Global Crossing.
>>
>>Mr. Perle insists that there is no conflict in his case because the Defense Policy Board is not involved in approving the Global Crossing deal. But that is not the right test. Global Crossing's fee is clearly payment, at least in part, for the influence Mr. Perle exerts through his Defense Department post, and federal ethics rules prohibit using public office for private gain. To remove the conflict, Mr. Perle will have to choose between the gain and the office.
>>