>>>Sorry folks, I have to apologyze for being so naive stating that the Iraq war was JUST about oil.
>>
>>What, then, are the main motives for the war, in your opinion? You seem to indicate that oil is one of them.
>
>mmmhhh, to cook an omelet perhaps? Since to do that you have to break some eggs.. or must we say balls?
>Anyway, it's nice to start a week laughing or at least smiling about irrelevant topics like “stubbed your toe”.
I didn't quite get the intention of that comment. If it was supposed to be a joke, I know much better ones.
>To contribute for more irrelevant laugh check:
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2003/iraq/forces/weapons/index.html “WoMD” Section. (Favorite and trustful “independent” source of info of many) I felt so sorry. Coallition doesn’t have ANY WoMD, Iraq has a lot. I knew it. Now it’s all clear.
I wonder what the hell is a "sub-strategic nuclear bomb".
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
