SNIP
>>To contribute for more irrelevant laugh check:
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2003/iraq/forces/weapons/index.html “WoMD” Section. (Favorite and trustful “independent” source of info of many) I felt so sorry. Coallition doesn’t have ANY WoMD, Iraq has a lot. I knew it. Now it’s all clear.
>
>I wonder what the hell is a "sub-strategic nuclear bomb".
It appears that there is a mis-understanding or disagreement as to what constitutes a 'weapon of mass destruction' if you have problems with the information on this site.
You can have strategic advantage without having weapons of mass destruction.
You may find this helpful:
http://www.nti.org/f_wmd411/f1a1.html perhaps is the 'source' of this information is more to your liking.
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
