>Note: BBC News (UK). Think this is a reliable source, isn't?
Usually, I consider BBC a
very reliable source. But since they are in one of the countries involved in the war, I would at least complement their information with other news sources. For instance, any news source might suddenly be "bought", or plainly forced to report in a less-than-objective fashion.
One good place of news (warning: their seat is in the U.S.!) is news.google.com - they index about 4000 news sources from all over the World. They don't do the reporting themselves.
It is not my intention to protest specifically against the U.S. or G.B. - but countries whose news I would - how should I say - try to complement with other sources, are those that are involved in the conflict: mainly Iraq, U.S., G.B.
Hilmar.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
