Tracy;

This product could not be released until the marketing department defined 10 reasons why. Sounds like David Letterman. :)

Tom



>http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/whyupgrade/top10w2k.mspx
>>>As of today, .NET server = Win2k + .NET application framework.
>>
>>Is that really it? I mean if it's the same as our actual server with the .NET framework, then, why have they released a new server as it is easily upgradable from Win2K server to that by just installing any other regular component. My assumption was that this server was fined tuned to work with the .NET framework, so optimized, thus additional components get installed with it.