Hmm, don't understand this first part at all.
What does facility of the English language have to do with this?
I used Tracy as cover??? She responded with all that needed to be said and didn't feel the need to say more.

As for the bible reference, the first part is what came to mind. I do think I might need to clarify that some. I want to explain that I didn't mean to that the people in the car had no vision. The people that come to mind when I read that are people like Bill Clinton, most of France and any one else who thinks you can simply ignore the Saddam's of the world. Because of these non-visionaries, people, the innocent and guilty, perish. Not only in war, but in the World Trade center, and Iraqi government crimes.

In the USA we believe everyone has certain inalienable rights. Not just Americans, and not just our allies. They are given to us by God and it is wrong for us to close our eyes when we see someone trying to take those away. We're not perfect, but we try our best. Our biggest mistake is that we didn't come to liberate Iraq sooner.

I am sorry that there are civilian casualties, but where was your voice of concern when Saddam was (and still is) terrorizing and killing his own people? Do you know of a better way to stop him? Or, do you suggest that we not care? Wait a minute. Forget I asked all that. I really don't care what you have to say about it. I read today about a young Iraqi woman who gave birth today and named her child America. America will grow up in a new Iraq. I'll wait to she what she has to say when she grows up.

You better hope that the USA is not this evil aggressor you want to pretend we are. We could easily make Ontario our newest state. But you know we're not like that. You also know that if someone were terrorizing the people of Canada, we would come to defend you too. Although it isn't necessary, thanks for the pity. And, no need to thank us. We're glad to be of service.


>>Nope, not gettin' into it. Tracy has said all that needed to be said. But, this did come to mind.
>
>Hey that's mighty big of you Ken, hurling an insult at a person whose facility with the English language is marginal compared to yours and then stepping back. Using TracyH (a woman) for cover. Trained by the Iraqi 'militia' I guess.
>
>>
>>Provebs 29:18
>>Where there is no vision, the people perish: but he that keepeth the law, happy is he.
>>KJV
>
>Who, exactly, is "keeping the law" with this war? The one who stepped on to foreign soil to start it? The one who crys when the under-powered and agressed use "unconventional tactics" to try to save themselves against overwelming and unbeatable FORCE?
>
>If a country acting as police/judge/jury/executioner is your idea of "keepeth the law" then I only have pity for you.
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Kenneth,
>>>
>>>>It's not fair to get into a battle of wits with unarmed men.
>>>
>>>Not sure if I understood the embeded cynicism in that sentence (I apologize if I made a bad translation of "wits" and "unarmed men" in such context), but does that mean a subtle willingness to join the discussion?
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>Fernando