Raj,

I use a different method to pack tables. I use tables with 200 fields of which 190 are ´memo´. I got the code from an article in the FoxAdvisor. I works like a charm. I can send you the code (with all credits to it´s creator) if you want.

Ron

>Table contains 140,000 records - (2.11 GB)
>
>When table has 101,000 records - (701 MB)
>
>Only for an additional 32,000 records additional table size increased (1.44 GB)
>
>Now the total size is 2.11 GB.
>
>
>Could you please tell me why is the table growing in its size so fast for only 32,000 records it went up with an additional 1.44 GB.
>
>Thank you very much.