>Are you telling me that only U.S.A. and U.K holds the truth?
No, but in this case, I am pretty sure France doesn't have it.
>Nuclear reactor: Other source of energy for other needs. Or perhaps I've been misled all that time. Do you mean that you guys (U.S.A.) have those nuclear plans only for war purposes?
Do you really believe that the nuclear reactor in Iraq was for energy needs? Perhaps French TV has been misleading you. Here is what the head of Saddam's nuclear program had to say:
>There's a place called U.N. Have you heard about it?
Yes. They are great at passing resolutions. Over 17 of which Saddam has ignored. Saddam has been in power for over 20 years now, torturing Iraqi citizens. Here is a report from Amnesty International:
Can you tell me what the U.N. has done in the last 20 years to end this?
>Yes torture should be stopped. But in the end you should'nt endure it in given countries because those are allied and take it as an argument to attack others. When you really want to eradicate some things there are always pacific ways to do it.
We have waited over 20 years. I think that is quite long enough.
