>Bret,
>
>It seems this mantra of "Anti-American" is getting boring, because you should know it's not true.

It is hard to tell the difference. Some think an Anti-American definition as: I am Anti-Bush, I am Anti-Cheney, I am Anti-American Policy.. Thus if you Americans don't do something about them, then I am Anti-you. So you see it is hard to separate the Government from the American people themselves.

>Instead you already noticed that ALL my criticism is against the Bush administration, and the folks surrounding him (Wolfovitz, Rumsfeld, Cheney & Co) because of their plans of american domination over the world,

American Domination over the World! I will not even touch that Quantum Leap.

>
>If you've noticed, MOST of my postings are references and links to News companies (most of them British BBC).

All your postings are to support your point of view. Try to show some balance. I cannot believe that you think nothing ever good will come out of Iraq and what is happening.

>
>Did I invented ONE single thing I've posted? Please point me it and I'll promptly apologize.

But you seek out only the ones you agree with.

>
>Do you deny the facts that I've been talking about? Tell wich one, please, and append your arguments to be further discussed.
>
>Nobody needs to tell the story of those disgraced people in Iraq that lived under the control of that bloody and miserable dictator. Think EVERYBODY is aware os his atrocities (including me). But that DOESN'T justifies the atrocities that are being made, once more, to that poor people, now imposed by the US military (with their "inteligent" weapons that just kill innocent civilians and journalists not sold to the US government propaganda).

If nothing was ever done, then tell me how many more would die or continue to suffer under Sadam?

By the way do you actually think that our weapons singled out journalists who report against the US. If that is the case then I think NPR (US National Public Radio) would have been targetted a while ago.

>Or you haven't seen the images or read/listened the reports? A sea of bombs over innocent people, killing and mutilating them, or US tanks bombing journalists for everybody in the world to watch, astonished, in TV, just as an example. Isn't that a massacre?
>
>So, in YOUR judgement, it's compreensible and justifiable to massacre innocent kids, women and old people with the excuse you are "liberating" them from the terror: with MORE terror, and you'll liberate the ones that'll last alive, even thou their lives will be destroyed for EVER.

Same question again, how long would you have waited and what would you have done?

>
>About Brazil: we are a country still full of injustices, and we already suffered tortures and murders made by our governants during the dictatorship and today we are facing a tough war, declared by our President Lula, against hungryness. 40+%, some sources indicate, of our population doesn't have enough or decent meals. We are not even able to do what OUR people needs, but even so we try to help other countries that are EVEN in more bad conditions than our people is (like in helping combating AIDS, because we have a very good program for that). Brasil is a country known by its friendship and conciliatory actions. We are not known to be belicists or imperialists. You have the power, the weapons (including WMD), the money. We just have good will, friendship and hospitality to offer. We share the little we have. Some of us have BIG mouths, like I have, to shout about injustices we see.

All countries, even our has problems internally. How you handle them, with your people's best interest at heart, will speak volumes to those other countries who are watching.