>>I don't know how you came to that conclusion. You must be connected with very high strong sources.
>
>Is French TV isn't telling you about the economic ties dictating French policy toward Iraq, or about France's involvement in Iraq's nuclear program, I have to wonder.

Do you think that there are no economic ties between the countries supporting the U.S.A.?


>>Ok that makes sense. But does this mean that U.S.A. and U.K will declare war to all the other countries that have (or want to have) nuclear reactors? Facts indicate that Irak's use of its nuclear reactor was for evil purposes. How will the U.S.A. and U.K. be sure that it's not the case for other countries. So just to be safe (better be safe than sorry) they'll declare war to every one of those countries? When do you start and when do you stop? In that case perhaps it's luck that led to know about the Iraq's hidden agenda.
>
>How did we go from your argument that Iraq was maybe using its nuclear reactor for peaceful energy purposes to the U.S. and U.K. declaring war on every country with a nuclear reactor? There has been no indication that the U.S and U.K. intend to do this. This is nothing but wild speculation, instead of looking at the current facts: we took down a regime that brutalized its own people.

What about he axes of evil? We all know that Iraq is the first target. The only thing we don't know is who will be next and when? And I'd bet that it wont be a matter of years before the when happens.

>>Who is we? SO far WE does'nt seem to be many major countries. For me the fact that U.N. rejected the idea of a war it's enough.
>
>Is this what you are hearing on French TV? Here are some of the major countries that support us:
>
>U.K.
>Spain
>Portugal
>Italy
>Poland
>Australia
>Saudi Arabia
>Kuwait
>
>In fact, the MAJORITY of European countries support us. Who does French TV say is against the U.S.?

Hmmm I think that there's something you really don't get here. The countries opposing are not against the U.S.A. they're against the WAR.