I agree entirely Fernando (a first!!!!!). Now if only countries could do the same... it's what we call an 'acceptable middle ground.' A point of acceptance or agreement in between what you think and what I think (or whoever).
>>
Ok, ok, I know. We've had this discussion... :o) As you can see, I am still reading your posts! :O)>
>Thanks for doing that, Tracy!
>
>The important thing here is, albeit we do not agree in many points (it doesn't matter the % of agreement), I found the path to keep discussing very freely with you and Tom and, not being the owner of the truth, I'm learning with you two and having the opportunity to show my points of view. That's what really matters: people having the opportunity to discuss with others and try to find a common sense (not consensus, but a point of mutual balance).
>
>Fernando
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"