Hi Tamar,

I agree with you on the intent of 'fair use,' but I've noticed that there have been some cases that have 'stretched' it a bit:

http://www.lgu.com/cr46.htm

and I found this article actually quite humorous:

http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/02/28/09gripe_1.html


>>You're confused. I'm not "fighting" fair use; I'm saying it is fair use ... and it's up to the other party to make a case that it's not.
>
>Seems to me that fair use is irrelevant here. Fair use relates to copyright; it's what gives us the right to quote short portions of a book in a term paper, for example.
>
>The discussion here isn't about copyright. It's about licensing.
>
>Tamar