>>>>That is like saying that you see that your neighbor is beating his wife, but it's not your right to intervene.
>>>
>>>What if :
>>>
>>>1 - She doesn't care, it's a coutume in this country
>>
>>Repression may be a custom, but not one welcomed by those receiving the beatings.
>
>you're finally getting my point.

I am afraid I am not getting your point.

>>>2 - you intervene and, btw, kill her child and bless her
>>
>>And what if we don't kill her child, and liberate them from their tormentor?
>
>the word here is IF

Saddam killed many, many, many more Iraqi civilians than the coalition military campaign did.

>>>3 - you give her a call saying that to morrow, she'll have to call you if her husband try again, and you don't come...
>>
>>In this case, that isn't going to happen.
>
>it happened, remember...

When?

>>>4 - you call the police (legal representant) because, in _your country, it's unlegal to beat his wife ...
>>
>>We tried that. The U.N. decided that 12 years wasn't enough time to see if the husband (Saddam) would change his behavior.
>
>Who lied, saying that the inspections/inspectors were not efficient?

Saddam repeatedly lied to the inspectors, trying to cover up his WMD program:

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/july-dec98/butler_11-10.html