I responded to the first part of your message, and missed the second part.

That second part (13.2) looks a lot like the Java license wording that Sun demands. I wonder if Borland, likely being required to use such a wording in their Java Builder product, simply added it to their general license agreement.

Alan

>
>
>4.5 ADDITIONAL LICENSE TERMS APPLICABLE TO UPGRADES
>
>If you have purchased an upgrade version of the
>Product, it constitutes a single product with the copy
>of the Product that you upgraded. This means that,
>although you may have two sets of Product media, you
>still have only one license. Therefore, you may not
>transfer the original copy of the Product to any other
>party.
>
>
>
>That's it.
>
>This part is interesting though:
>
>
>13.2 Hazardous Uses. The Product is not intended for
> use, and you may not use or allow others to use the
> Product, in connection with any application
> requiring fail-safe performance such as the
> operation of nuclear power facilities, air traffic
> control or navigation systems, weapons control
> systems, life support systems, or any other system
> whose failure could lead to injury, death,
> environmental damage or mass destruction. You agree
> that Borland will have no liability of any nature,
> and you are solely responsible, for any expense,
> loss, injury or damage incurred as a result of such
> use of the Product.
>