Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
SQL 7.0 vs 8.0
Message
De
15/04/2003 17:21:30
Henry Ravichander
RC Management Systems Inc.
Saskatchewan, Canada
 
 
À
15/04/2003 17:15:50
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Autre
Titre:
Divers
Thread ID:
00777961
Message ID:
00778082
Vues:
22
>No, don't change the GROUP BY clauses...you need to determine if the fields that aren't in the group by clause are returning the correct information (for example, other fields could return correct information if they contain repeating information).
>
>Does that make sense?
>
Steve:

Here's what I tried. I added the two remaining fields to the Group By Clause and the error message no longer appeared. I had left another Group bY Clasue as is - and that code returned an error message when it ran.

But what you are saying is, not to add anymore fields to the group by clause? The results returned by the other two fields by teh original Group By Clause were correct i.e., contained the lastname and the name of the doctor. And do I take it, that I simply setengine to 70 here and turn it back on to 80 as soon as the select statement is done?
- Ravi

True greatness consists in being great in little things.
- Charles Simmons
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform