General information
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
>>If you use the FOR clause then ALL clause is not needed. FOR does an implicit ALL in all scope statements.
>
>Ok, I missed the first part where he wanted to replace multiple records.
It was hard to tell from Juan's question exactly what he wanted to do. Your reply was completely correct but I added the scope in case Juan wanted also to find those records that had the @field in it as well.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only