1 - The test data I have used so far has has 3 records for 7T and 1 record for 7B. When the first replace happens which changes 7T to -1T, only 1 record is changed. This is where the problem begins. The second and third replace affects only 1 record due to that is all there was to test on. I will continue with my tests.

But for the replace command, in VFP6 the ALL scope was assumed when you have a for clause to my knowledge.

2 - I am under the impression that ALL is not required when there is a for clause. Am I correct in this for vfp7? The ALL clauses in the other replaces was my testing it out. I did have the ALL clause on the first replace but do not right now.

3 - Yes there are multiple matching records, but I will double check.

4 - The swap routine is called with valid bays, the locates are just to get info from the records.

5 - The route_status_vp record is properly positioned.

Jason