>
>Michael,
>I object to last paragraph about XMLToCursor is slower. I used that as a workaround in my project. You could add a schema or let the VFP decide.
>StrExtract() similar to substr() is expected to be slow when done against N occurences. If you don't like XMLToCursor speed then you might try FLL alternatives (not one on hand currently).
>Cetin
According to thread#
589312 it's much slower than STREXTRACT() for large documents.
Kogo Michael Hogan
"Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?"
I think so Brain, but "Snowball for Windows"?
Ideate Web Site