The reason nobody is answering is that by now this thing has been done to death, and I think everyone is in agreement that, while the EULA sort of bans the use of VFP distributables on Linux, it does not say anything about the use of the VFP development system itself. So nobody is going to show you any lines.

Alan

>Sergey, I appreciate that you reply. As a matter of fact, you're even the only replyer! However, you're not answering my question at all and the 'clarification' is not an answer also. I've asked people here to SHOW ME the lines in the EULA that 'forbid' usage on Linux. Several other requests to do so were posted by me in the other related threads. NO ONE answered!
>
>I'm astonished by the lack of response. Or is it me? Perhaps my English is unclear? I tell you (don't take it personally), I'll ask the question at least three more times in new threads until someone finally takes the time to show me the lines in the EULA.
>
>
>>>Who's gonna show me the statement in the EULA that should make clear to me that it's forbidden????
>>>
>>>I really can not find it! Therefore, I'm of opinion that Ken (or whoever) called Whil had no right to do that at all. The EULA simply does NOT forbid us to use Visual FoxPro on Linux.
>>>
>>>Once more, who's gonna show me that I'm wrong?????
>>
>>Clarification Thread #781789 Message #781789