Thanks Philipp,

I've just notice that the statisticians were not initialysing the Rand(-1) function before using it, Thats why they were getting odd result.



>>I'm not sure, I'm working with statisticians in a genetic company and they say that Fox's random function is giving more result in the lower boundry and they don't like it. I'm not a statistician myself so I cannot argue with them so I'm trying to find an external product.
>
>i am not a statistician (far, far away from that), but the result from the following test looks very uniform to me.

>?rand(-1)
>for i=1 to 1000
>   dime a_TestArray(i, 1)
>   a_TestArray(i, 1) = rand()
>endfor
>
>Below50 = 0
>Above50 = 0
>for i=1 to alen(a_TestArray, 1)
>   if a_TestArray(i, 1) < .5
>      Below50 = Below50 + 1
>   else
>      Above50 = Above50 + 1
>   endif
>endfor
>
>clear
>?Below50
>?Above50
>