I read your code, great job!. I simulated the test in a loop of 10,000 and produced similar results.

Thanks UT is great,
Jeff

>>Interesting, the reason that I'm posing this question is that this program has been in place for about 8 months. A question arose when a certain person was selected for the 4th time, others having never been chosen at all. My reply is "that's because it's random!", but wanted a little feedback to reinforce my position.
>
>I tested RAND() some time ago and concluded it's pretty good: Re: Reliability of RAND() function Thread #386726 Message #386863