Information générale
Catégorie:
Crystal Reports
Craig,
You are right and much appreciated advice! VFP 8.0 did this automatically when I entered the type libraries. Man oh Man hours have gone by.... A timely book thanks for the effort.
By the way, I believe the CRAXDRT listing is the 8.x stuff the CRAXDDRT is the 9.x stuff. This is so you can run both versions.
I have a few noted spelling and typos do I list those at Hentzenwerke?
Regards,
Jim
>James,
>
>I'm not sure what's happening. The Crystal Reports 9 components show up just fine in my VFP 7. Did you try to refresh the Type Library listing on the Type Library References dialog from the Intellisense Manager?
>
>
>>Our current development projects use VFP 7.0 sp1. We also purchased CrysDev, Craig Berntson's book, on developing reports using VFP/Crystal Reports.
>>
>>Following the instructions in the book using VFP 7.0, I was having a difficult time getting the type libraries to show up in the Intellisense Type Library Reference Manager. I went to VB 6.0 and looked up the References and they showed as Craig shows for VFP in his book.
>>
>>I then made sure the dlls were registered using regsvr32. Still no luck in VFP 7.0 sp1. Then I installed VFP 8.0 and low and behold all of the Active X components show up just like in VB 6.0 and Craig's book.
>>
>>So, my question is, Does VFP 7.0 have a problem in Intellisense with the Crystal Reports 9.0 Dev ActiveX components (I can see the 8.5 components from VFP 7.0)?
>>
>>Also, Crystal has renamed many of the files like Craxdrt.dll.
>>
>>craxddrt9.dll
>>crdesignerctrl9.dll
>>keycode.dll
>>crviewer9.dll
>>
>>This enables multiple version of Crystal to be run on a work station. So, as many of our users do, users who have version 8.5 or earlier can still use this functionality while accessing version 9.0.
>>
>>Any assistance is appreciated.
>>
>>Jim Smith
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement