Hi Kirk,
I meant to post this to you too, but failed in my post to Jordan, so here it is--I attended the TS2 seminar on server 2003 and my personal opinions I posted:
Re: .NET server VS regular server Thread #
772169 Message #
775230My biggest concern would be the Terminal Server costs for all of those clients if you decide to incorporate 2003 server and the 2003 Terminal Server.
>Since this will be a new setup of hardware (no pre-existing equipment for this project), I was thinking/planning on encouraging them to go with Windows 2003 Advance Server for the amount of memory it can handle, the option to move to a 64-bit platform (it's their money), and because of the increased file handling speed I've read about (all from MS by the way...I'm sure it's all true).
>
>Kirk
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
