I know of a few MM.net users that had a fairly easy time using it and they were not MM VFP users, but users of another popular framework in VFP. They told me it was easy to start using because Kevin's frameworks follow the grandpa of framework's standards.


>>>I wouldn't agree with this statement. MM.NET is >very< similar to the VFP version. If you are saying there isn't any migration path from a VFP MM's project to MM.NET, then I would agree.
>>
>>Correct, my main point.
>>
>>You do not appear to disagree with my thoughts vis-a-vis the long term committment to MM.Fox. Is this correct? I know you use MM.Fox - do you get the same feeling regarding Kevin's interest? Just curious.
>
>I know Kevin is focusing on MM.NET right now, and a new version of the VFP version is further away than Kevin originally planned. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't a bit disappointed by this. I will say this, if I was evaluating a new framework today I would at least consider this question (but I don't think it's the only, or most important consideration).