>In otherwords, just so we're clear:
>
>The UT makes no attempts protect information about a member's UT usage from other UT members.
>
>Correct?

As I said in the other message, we have basic privacy features available for allowing a member to not have his email being used, for hidding his visual email online, his address and his phone number. That said, it doesn't mean that more privacy features won't come in earlier on. As for the usage, since the first day the list of members online has been there. For years, we have the ability for a member to get access to your entire messages. In the last year, we added the ability to see if a member is online, was recently online or not online. So, the usage is not new. Several features are related to it. As for the message stats, this is recently new and it will remain as we judged that it is a great benefits to have. As also mentioned in the other message, it's basically a choice of the member. We have Terms & Conditions which are easy to understand. Anyone is allowed to accept them or not. For example, I already had a member who asked me to remove his account just after he created it, "no message created", because he didn't like that our site was having a username access. Even if I explained him that this was needed as this is the entire idea being the site's content, he wanted to not have it. So, in that example, that was one reason that someone didn't want to use it. That is ok with us. We don't expect the entire world to fall in love with the site. We just try to make it evolved in the best way as possible by doing the best job as we can.