Perhaps a bilingual editor who will fulfill the responsibilities of editing the magazine for a year and in return will receive a free one-year PUTM membership? No outlay that way...

>>It is riddled with grammar errors. "improve" should be "improvement" or otherwise, "they keynotes" should be "the keynotes", you're missing a couple commas, and the use of language is simply mediocre.
>>
>>As for money, I'll edit your magazine for free if you wish. Using the lack of money as an excuse to not take on board someone for customer relations that speaks their language, however, is a complete cop out. Hey, I'm tight on money too, should I cut quality assurance at my business and tell my paying customers that "I don't have enough money to make sure your experience with us is high quality" and excpect them to buy it? Yeah right.
>
>Your comment is taken. But, with the use of terms such as "mediocre" and "cop out" thrown at us, I'll simply thank you for your offer. I already mentioned several times that I'll take the time to sit down and consider suggestions and related - when this is done in a fair way within a productive approach. That was also one reason I wrote that article earlier on.
>
>As for the magazine, despite the perfection not reached, we've been bombarded with more excellent comments at DevTeach so I guess we do something good some times considering the very small infrastructure that we benefit from to release between 60 and 70 pages per month now in three languages within two mediums of delivery. By the same, I'll take the time to thanks Martin who does a tremendous job at it, so are our regular contributors and technical writers. They do believe in it and that is extremely appreciated. When time will allow it, we'll be able to solidy our infrastructure. But until now, we are facing boundaries and that is part of a reality.