>
>I was responding specifically to CraigB's non sequitur. It was he who was making "excuses" (for the VFP Team)

Just to be clear .. I was making no excuses. I was merely trying to educate people on how the process works,

>and citing (imagined) "business reasons" why there have been some specific deficiencies (issues) identified and why (or why not) a SP might be planned.

Not imagined at all. What I described is very real.

Once again, for the record, I would like to see the bugs be squished. I just don't know if what exists warrants an SP. I don't have enough information to determine that.