>>Very nice indeed! But it worked so fast and took so many cycles that ESC didn't respond. >>Had to kill the process :) > >Interesting - I didn't have that problem. Perhaps because I am still using a 300 MHz machine? > >I assume using inkey() within the loop will be safer in cases like these?
Maybe. A fast box would need some kind of wait state to take a breather and read the keyboard every once in a while :) Maybe also with the Sleep API.
"Once again, we come to the Holiday Season, a deeply religious time that each of us observes, in his own way, by going to the mall of his choice." -- Dave Barry
